Now, I'm all for busting scum who prey on children, I think they are monsters that should be beaten within an inch of their lives and thrown in prison forever. My problem is with the very concept of setting people up to deliberately throw them in prison. Its one thing to arrest people for doing bad things, it's another entirely to encourage them into doing bad things in order to arrest them.
Remember the forgotten wallet sting I posted about a few weeks ago, where cops left a purse or wallet out then busted people who didn't go to them with the item? Here's a few other examples of "stings" of this type.
In Thousand Oaks, California (near Los Angeles), police put an unlocked car full of newly purchased Christmas presents in a parking lot and watched it:
It wasn't like police weren't trying to make it as enticing as possible: They left the car's trunk open and car windows down at times. The vehicle was left outside of Best Buy on Moorpark Road, the Janss Marketplace and The Oaks mall.Nobody did. Some locked and closed the door. Some found the cops and told them. Some told mall security. People just wouldn't play along. Here's another example, a bit more risque:
The stuff left in the car was worth enough to trigger a felony charge if anyone took the bait.
Robin Garrison, an off-duty 42-year-old firefighter, was walking in Berliner Park in Columbus, Ohio, in May when he saw a woman sunbathing topless under a tree.Half naked women? No problem. Man whips it out when asked to by a beautiful topless woman who's foldling him with her foot? Call the cops! Who is the pervert here again? At Protein Wisdom Darleen highlighted these cases and a morality lecture at a college, pointing out how society is confused on the topic (to put it mildly) noting the problem with these stings:
He approached her and they started talking and getting comfortable, the woman smiling and resting her foot on his shoulder at one point.
Eventually, she asked to see Garrison's penis; he unzipped his pants and complied.
Seconds later, undercover police officers pulled up in a van and arrested Garrison; he was later charged with public indecency, a misdemeanor, based on video footage taken by cops who were targeting men having sex or masturbating in the park. While topless sunbathing is legal in the city's parks, exposing more than that is against the law.
The major fallout of poorly conceived and executed stings is the increased distrust of, and cynicism towards police. And not just police, but to even the concepts of private/public behavior and property are questioned.Commenters discussed the problem:
OK here's the part where I wax philosophical.He approached her and they started talking and getting comfortable, the woman smiling and resting her foot on his shoulder at one point.If some guy I just started chatting with rested his foot on my shoulder, I would think he was a pervert.
-by May Bee
In order to keep the peace among three kids at the dinner table my mom stressed that we were supposed to “pay attention to our own plates.”
This I took to mean, if I pay attention to my brussels sprouts and unfinished mashed potatoes, my sister and brother’d focus in on theirs, too. I call this the “Don’t look over my fence, and I won’t look over yours” school of self-regulation. And I think it works.
The problem with ’stings’ is, law enforcement folks (and more and more, privately retained “investigators”) go out of their way to engineer entry for themselves into a “mark’s” private sphere with the hopes of convicting that person for something.
That is the opposite of what I was taught, and it resembles the behaviors that Americans used to berate when they occured among the Chinese in Beijing in the late 60’s.
Sometimes, it appears the Chinese Communists forced our evolution their way thru the 70’s and 80’s, not the other way around.
I think Darleen’s bigger point is a good one and well put. When everything is illegal–from smoking in your own car to putting out the trash in the wrong bin –people’s morality gets muddled and they resist doing what they know they ought to.
Darleen's point is that when law enforcement acts in unwise or improper ways to arrest bad guys - or at least guys who if a clever lawyer is involved can be shown to have technically violated the letter of the law - then the general public loses it's way morally and is unsure how to behave. Find a purse, take it to the lost and found... and find yourself arrested. Weren't you doing the right thing? Not when the cops are working a sting deliberately trying to generate crime and thus arrests. So how are we to behave? Apathy toward your fellow man seems to become the proper response, but then there are laws that jail people for not helping out when they can - as shown famously in the last episode of Seinfeld.
As if a deliberate illustration of this, in the comments I didn't quote several people talked about how they download music from record companies and feel good about how they are ripping off the evil or corrupt music business. Artists complained about how they are abused by record companies and producers, and suggested that downloads don't actually hurt them very much in terms of revenue.
Yet the entire point of that discussion is perfect for the original writer's point: because the RIAA is acting so insanely overprotective and greedy, people feel justified in ripping them off. Because people are ripping them off, the RIAA feels justified in acting the way it does. In essence, each side is using the other's ill behavior as their reason for how they act. And the cycle becomes self-feeding, with each side condemning the other and losing their way entirely from an ethical perspective.
The problem we're facing is that without a shared, absolute ethical basis for behavior, without society agreeing upon right and wrong based on one standard, we're left with trying to force moral behavior by rule of law. Where this fails is that law cannot encourage moral behavior, it can only punish some immoral behavior. So when you lose that central pillar that holds up the canopy of morality over a culture, you lose all sense of right and wrong and are simply reduced to legally actionable.
Without that guide, nobody is sure how to act, and the law enforcement community loses their direction and purpose as well. Ask a police officer what their job is, and 9 times out of 10 they will say "to protect the community, to keep safety." Sounds great, but it's not true, at least not in the purest sense. Police officers are supposed to enforce the law, not keep the peace. Keeping the peace is the result of their enforcement efforts, it is a byproduct. Keeping the peace means doing nothing when acting will cause more problems than it solves. Keeping the peace means ignoring the traffic when everyone is driving 80 in a 70 MPH zone, because it's orderly and peaceful - even though it's illegal.
Cops who don't understand the ethical basis and spirit of the law they are supposed to enforce end up with jobs like placing things out hoping people steal them. And the culture suffers as a result: we lose not just morality, but law its self.